It’s so sad that the lawyers at Matkowsky are not transparent enough with their communication, that after months of no communication until prompted, have to ask the judge for a time extension, after they did not submit the application in time for the deadline. Only invoices and “unfortunatelys’”are sent on time… or prior!
I’d advise you, to look for another law firm to well represent you, as Matkowsky will cost you too much unnecessary time and money. If I could rate half a star for trying to work with Paul, my family and I gladly would!
All the best to you if you’re looking for assistance on the same, and I hope that you won’t have to go through agony close to what this law firm will give you, while only looking to be with the ones you love, and have better life opportunities.
There’s also no option to reply to your response for the above; so I’ll do it here…
what you’re saying is untrue, and really details about my case representation that may not be necessary to talk about now. My complain review, as is what this section is about is about transparency to better present ones’ ‘case’.
When representing a client, this is mandatory and key. Your email responses have not been precise, and you only reached out, since stating that it would take sometime(which you could have stated the reasons why), until yesterday to give a verdict that could have well been considered earlier. It’s best not to make promises earlier on, and be transparent with what is actually happening.
I cannot hold these judicial changes against you, but you did not do your job. This is just it!
As for the call, it’s really to pass the message verbally, that the verdict was denied, as you did not meet the deadline that you later came to know about. Thank you for taking the time to reply so fast on here.